AN ANALYSIS OF CSRINITIATIVESFOR RURAL DEVELOPMENT IN INDIA

Authors

  • Dr. Preeta Lall Dr. Vinod Joshi Assistant Professor Economics , Dr. Radhabai Navin Kanya Mahavidyalaya Raipur Professor , Economics , Dr. Radhabai Navin Kanya Mahavidyalaya Raipur

Keywords:

CSR, Hybrid Implementation Model and Cross Sectional Analysis

Abstract

India is on road to rapid development and our companies are now expanding their footprints on foreign soil as well. But due to this rapid growth environmental aspects has been continuously overlooked. To counter the damage Companies Act of 2013 was passed which acts as a guardian to the nature and affected stakeholders of the companies operation. The research work focus on development of best flows and model for implementing CSR activities by cross sectional analysis of mode of implementation of CSR activities by the companies after 2013 Act. The developed models are hybrid best practices model for CSR implementation,

References

Arora Bimal and Puranik Ravi (2004). A Review of Corporate Social Responsibility in India. Development 47(3): 93-100.

Barton, J. H. (2007). New Trends in Technology Transfer: Implications for National and International Policy, Issue Paper No. 18.

Bichta, C. (2003). Corporate socially responsible industry (CSR) practices in the context of Greek. Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 10, 12-24.

Bowen, H R (1953), Social Responsibilities of the Businessman, Harper & Row, New York.

Carroll. A. B. (1979) “A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate social performance”, Academy of Management Review, Vol 4, pp. 497-505.

British Council, UNDP, CII and Price waterhouse Coopers (2002), Corporate Social Responsibility Survey 2002– India, British Council, India.

Business Indiaa. (2004). “People power community initiatives for social issues are an integral part of corporate social responsibility”, Vol 686, pp. 110.

Business Indiab. (2004). Prioritizing action corporate social responsibility is increasing in India, Vol 698, pp. 122-123.

Davis, K. (1960). Can business afford to ignore corporate social responsibility? California Management Review, 2, 70-76.

Detomasi, D. A. (2008). The political roots of corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 82, 807-819.

Freeman, R. E. and Phillips, R. A. (2002). Stakeholder theory: A libertarian defense. Business Ethics Quarterly, 12(3), 331-349.

Garriga, E. and Mele, D. (2004) Corporate social responsibility theories: Mapping and territory. Journal of Business Ethics, 53, 51-74.

Downloads

Published

2015-08-31

Issue

Vol. 4 No. 9 (2015): AUGUST 2015

Section

Articles

License

Copyright Notice

Submission of an article implies that the work described has not been published previously (except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture or academic thesis), that it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere, that its publication is approved by all authors and tacitly or explicitly by the responsible authorities where the work was carried out, and that, if accepted, will not be published elsewhere in the same form, in English or in any other language, without the written consent of the Publisher. The Editors reserve the right to edit or otherwise alter all contributions, but authors will receive proofs for approval before publication.

Copyrights for articles published in World Scholars journals are retained by the authors, with first publication rights granted to the journal. The journal/publisher is not responsible for subsequent uses of the work. It is the author's responsibility to bring an infringement action if so desired by the author.