A CRITIQUE OF DISPLACEMENT, REHABILITATION AND RESETTLEMENT POLICY IN INDIA

Authors

  • Amrit Zangmo Research Scholar, Department of Political Science (P.U Chandigarh)

Keywords:

development, irrigation.

Abstract

Independent India’s economic development based on large projects and big industries were accompanied by widespread displacement. It has been argued that alienation, deprivation and inequality are inherent in the strategy of Indian development. Annually the lives and livelihood of nearly ten million people across the globe are affected by force displacement of Infrastructure projects such as irrigation schemes, mines, industries, power plant and roads. Though million of people have been displaced by various planned development scheme since Independence no reliable data exist on the extent of displacement and rehabilitation. Thus due to the lack of a detailed and comprehensive rehabilitation and resettlement policy the process of resettlement of displaced people has been minimal and not very successful. It becomes clear that the objectives of any just and equitable law and policy dealing with the social and human impact of big dams cannot be limited only to minimize the trauma of displacement and ensuring the just resettlement of the victims of displacement. It must incorporate the objective to end or severely curtail displacement itself to no longer accept state induced involuntary displacement and resettlement as an inevitable cost of all developmental projects. Clearly developmental rehabilitation has any chance of becoming a reality only if it is backed by effective sanctions of law and institutions.

References

I.Baijal, Pradip, and P. K.Singh, (2000) Large Dams: Can We Do Without Them, Economic and Political Weekly, Vol.35, No.19, pp. 1659-1666.

II.Bandyopadhyay, Jayanta,(1995) Sustainability of Big dams in Himalayas, Economic and Political Weekly, Vol.30, No.38, pp. 2367-2370.

III.Cernea, Michael M., (March1995) Re-examine Displacement: A Redefinition of Concepts in Development and Conservation, Social Change, Vol.36, No.1, pp.8-35.

IV.Fernandes, Walter, (2004) Rehabilitation Policy for the Displaced, Economic and Political Weekly, Vol.39, No.12, pp. 1191-1193.

V.Fernandes, Walter, Priyanca Mathur Veleth, Madhuresh Kumar and Ishita Dey, (Oct. 2007) The Draft National Rehabilitation Policy 2006 and The Communal Violence Bill 2005:A Critique of the Rehabilitation Policy of the Government of India, Mahanirban Calcutta Research Group.

VI.Guha, Abhijit, (Nov.2005) Resettlement and Rehabilitation: First national policy, Economic and Political Weekly, Vol.40, No.46, pp. 4798-4802.

VII.Mohanty, Biswaranjan, (March 2005) Displacement and Rehabilitation of Tribals, Economic and Political Weekly, Vol.40, No.13, pp.1318-1320.

VIII.Palit, Chittaroopa, (2004) Short Changing the Displaced: National Rehabilitation policy, Economic and Political Weekly, Vol.39, No.27, pp. 2861-2963.

IX.Penz, Peter, (2006) Development Displacement and Ethics, The centre for Refugee Studies, York University.

X.Sah, D.C., (1995) Development and Displacement: National Rehabilitation Policy, Economic and Political Weekly, Vol.30, No.48, pp. 3055-3058.

XI.Sahaee, Roopee, (2003) National Rehabilitation Policy: Many Loopholes, Economic and Political Weekly, Vol.38, No.6, pp. 510-512.

XII.Sen, Jay, (1995) National Rehabilitation Policy: A Critique, Economic and Political Weekly, Vol.30, No.5, pp. 241-244.

XIII.Thukral, Enakshi Ganguly (ed.), (1992) Big Dams, Displaced People: River of Sorrow, River of Change, Sage publication, New Delhi.

Downloads

Published

2016-01-31