DEVELOPMENT AND TESTING OF TWIN ROW DRUM PLANTER FOR MAIZE
Keywords:
Maize, planter, performance testing, seed spacing, missing index, field efficiency.Abstract
In India still traditional farming is going on because of the tools used in sowing operation are manual like kurpi, dibbler or manual seed spreading resulting irregular plant to plant as well as row to row spacing. Due to high cost of planting and excessive time requirement the above mention processed are not profitable when using high cost hybrid seeds. Due to small land holding power operated machineries are not so popular between farmers. Twin row seeding of maize gives more yields as compared to conventional method. Therefore, there is a need of low cost manual drawn machine for planting in twin row planting pattern. The planter performance testing was conducted in laboratory and field condition for maize, Narendra-M 909 variety with different combination of seed box fill level viz. Full, Half and Quarter and travel speed viz. 1 km/h, 1.5 km/h and 2 km/h approximately. The metering seed box was set that it place seed at 25 cm plant to plant distance and 70 cm row to row distance. At half fill seed box level performance superior with high values 77.09%, 75.2%, 80.27% of feed index; 11.11%, 13.8% and 8.33% missing index, 11.8%, 11%, 11.4% multiple index. Mean seed spacing, 28.3 cm. The cost of operation for planting without including seed cost of maize were ` 149.51 per hectare area. The cost of planter is Rs. 6000/-
References
I. Alam Anwar and Singh Gyanedra(2003).Status and future needs of farm mechanization and agro-processing in India.Central institute of agriculture engineering, Bhopal 44-45.
II. Anonymous, (1993). IS test code for sowing equipment .Bureau of Indian Standard (IS-63 16)
III. Anonymous, (1992a). Sowing and planting equipments. Improved machinery for Oil Seed Production, CIAE, Bhopal, 24-40.
IV. Balkcom, K.S., J.L. Satterwhite, F.J. Arriaga, A.J. Price, and E. Van Santen.(2011).Conventional and glyphosate-resistant maize yields across plant densities in single- and twin row configurations. Field Crops Res. 120:330–337. doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2010.10.013.
V. Bart-Plange, Addo A., Aveyire J., Tutu E. (2007).Friction coefficient of Maize, Cowpea and Groundnuts on different structural surfaces.Journal of Science and technology, vol. 27 no.1, 142-149.
VI. Blamey F. P. C., Bell M. J. N., Moody P. W.(2002). Management of Phosphorus for Sustainable Food Crop Production on Acid Upland Soils in Australia, Philippines and Vietnam. ACIAR Project Final Report LWR1 1994/014, University ofQueensland, Brisbane, Australia.
VII. Bullock, D.G., Nielsen, R.L., Nyquist, W.E., (1988).A growth analysis comparison of corn grown in conventional and equidistant plant spacing. Crop Sci. 28, 254–258.
VIII. Duncan, W.G., (1984). A theory to explain the relationship between corn populations and grain yield. Crop Sci. 24, 1141–1145.
IX. Dutta, S.K., V.K. Nema and R.K. Bhardwaj, (1988a).Physical properties of gram. J. Agric. Eng. Res., 39: 259-268.
X. Fulton, J.M., (1970). Relationships among soil moisture stress, plant populations, row spacing, and yield of corn. Can. J. Plant Sci. 50, 31–38.
XI. G. F. Botta, A. Tolo´n-Becerra, X. Lastra-Bravo, M. Tourn, R. Balbuena, D.Rivero, (2013). Continuous application of direct sowing: Traffic effect on subsoil compaction and maize (Zea mays L.) yields in Argentinean Pampas, Soil & Tillage Research 134, 111–120
XII. Gebresenbet, G., Gibbon, D., Astatke, A., (1997). Draft Animal Power : Lessons from past research and development activities in Ethiopia and indicators for future needs. IRDC Currents,13/14, 1997, Wikstroms, Uppsala, 971324.
XIII. Gite, L.P. and S.K Patra,(1981).Functional components. Sowing and Fertilizer Application Equipment of India, CIAE, Bhopal, 13-16.
XIV. Gupta, C.P. and TotokHerwanto, (1992).Design and development of direct paddy seeder.Agricultural mechanization in Asia, Africa and Latin America.Vol 23, No.1, Pp. 23-27.
XV. Heinemann Jr., W. H., J. W. Cary, and A. E. Dilworth. (1973).Experimental machines for autodibble planting. Transactions of the ASAE 16(4):656-659.
XVI. Jasa, P. J. (1981). Corn seed spacing uniformity in various tillage systems.M.S. thesis. Lincoln, Nebr.: University of Nebraska.
XVII. Kachman, S. D., and J. A. Smith.(1995). Alternative measures of accuracy in plant spacing for planters using single seed metering. Transactions of the ASAE 38(2):379-387
XVIII. Karayel, D. &Ozmerzi, A. (2004).Effect of forward speed on hill dropping uniformity of a precision vacuum seeder. Horticultural Technology,14 (3), 364–367.
XIX. Karlen, D.L., M.J. Kasperbauer, and J.P. Zublena.(1987). Row-spacing effects on corn in the southeastern U.S. Appl. Agric. Res. 2:65–73.
XX. Ladehinde, M.L. and S.R. Verma (1994).Performance evaluation of hand – operated seed planters in light and medium soils in Nigeria.Agricultural mechanization in Asia, Africa and Latin America. Vol. 27, No. 3, Pp 17 – 19.
XXI. Maddonni, G.A., Otegui, M.E., (1996). Leaf area, light interception, and crop development in maize. Field Crops Res. 48, 81–87.
XXII. Molin, J. P., and V. D’Agostini.(1996). Development of a rolling punch planter for stony soil conditions. Agric. Mech. Asia, Africa and Latin America 27(3):17-19.
XXIII. Molin, J. P., Bashford L. L., Von Bargen K., Leviticus L. I. (1998). Design and evaluation of a punch planter for no – till system.American Society of Agricultural Engineers 41(2):307-314
XXIV. Monsanto technology development, (2010). Evaluation of Twin Rows in Corn, Monsanto national research summary 2009.
XXV. M. Harunur Rashid, M. MurshedulAlam, M. AkhterHossain Khan, J.K. Ladha, (2009).Productivity and resource use of direct-(drum)-seeded and transplanted rice in puddled soils in rice-rice and ricewheat ecosystems, Field Crops Research, Volume 113, Issue 3, Pages 274-281.
XXVI. Ottman, M.J., Welch, L.F. (1989). Planting patterns and radiation interception, plant nutrient concentration, and yield in corn. Agron. J. 81, 167–174.
XXVII. Ozarslan C. (2002). Physical properties of cotton seed.Biosyst. Eng. 83(2), 169–174.
XXVIII. Pintér, L., J. Nemeth, Z. Pinter, and M. Szirbik.(1978). Trend of grain yield in maize (ZeamaysL.) hybrids as a function of plant number per unit area and sowing uniformity.ActaAgronomicaHungaricae 27:398-404.
XXIX. RaoM.V., PradhanS.N. (1973).Cultivation Practices. Rice Production Manual. ICAR, 71-95.
XXX. Reddy, K., Boykin, N.J.C., (2010). Weed control and yield comparisons of twin – row and Single – row glyphosate – resistant cotton production systems. Weed Technol. 24, 95–101.
XXXI. Robles M., Ignacio A. Ciampitti, and Tony J. Vyn (2012).Responses of Maize Hybrids to Twin-Row Spatial.Agron. J. 104:1747–1756.
XXXII. Sorensen P., Smith L. (1994). Pathological Outcomes of Observational Learning.Econometrica, 68, 371–398.
XXXIII. Singh, S., and Singh, G. (2007).Evaluation of different methods of establishment in wheat (Triticumaestivum) after different methods of rice (Oryzasativa) establishment.Pantnagar J. Res.5,36–40.
XXXIV. Suthar S. H. and Das S. K. (1996).Some physical properties of karingda seeds. J. Agric. Eng. Res. 65(1): 15-22.
XXXV. Teasdale, J.R., (1995). Influence of narrow row/high population corn (Zea mays) on weed control and light transmittance. Weed Technol. 9, 113–118.
XXXVI. Tharp, B.E., Kells, J.J. (2001). Effect of glufosinate-resistant corn (Zea mays) population and row spacing on light interception, corn yield, and common lambs quarters (Chenopodium album) growth. Weed Technol. 15, 413–418.
XXXVII. Tourino, M. C. C. Rezende, P. M. De Almeida, L. G. P. De Silva, L. A. Da (2007). Comparative degree in uniformity/seed distribution in function of the seeders type.
XXXVIII. Widdicombe, W.D., Thelen, K.D. (2002). Row width and plant density effects on corn grain production in the Northern Corn Belt. Agron. J. 94, 1020–1023.
XXXIX. Zeliha, B.B. and Aziz, O. (2004).Effect of different operating parameters on seed holding in the single seed metering unit of a pneumatic planter.Turkish journal of agricultural and forestry.Vol – 28, 435 – 441.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright Notice
Submission of an article implies that the work described has not been published previously (except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture or academic thesis), that it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere, that its publication is approved by all authors and tacitly or explicitly by the responsible authorities where the work was carried out, and that, if accepted, will not be published elsewhere in the same form, in English or in any other language, without the written consent of the Publisher. The Editors reserve the right to edit or otherwise alter all contributions, but authors will receive proofs for approval before publication.
Copyrights for articles published in World Scholars journals are retained by the authors, with first publication rights granted to the journal. The journal/publisher is not responsible for subsequent uses of the work. It is the author's responsibility to bring an infringement action if so desired by the author.