A STUDY OF EFFECTIVENESS OF LEADERSHIP STYLE AND ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT

Authors

  • Dr. Rajkumari Singh Mrs. Bhupendra Kaur -

Keywords:

Abstract

The past century has taught us several ways of viewing educational organizations. One prominent model is the traditional approach, which views organizations as a hierarchical system in which power and intelligence are originated at the top and passed down through commands and control to the lower levels of the system before being put into practice. Schools and school leadership have continued to be scrutinized by the legislature and government. With the passage of such laws as No Child Left Behind, the accountability standard of government schools has risen to all-time levels. This literature review seeks to discover the effects school leaders have on student achievement. This literature review will look at a variety of leadership styles, seek to identify the direct/indirect influences of school leadership on learning, look at leadership and teacher efficacy traits that impact learning and consider school leadership traits that lead to student achievement. In summary, the research has demonstrated that school leadership has both direct and indirect implications leading to student achievement. Most leadership influences are indirect; these indirect influences lead to increased collective efficacy and improved school culture. In conclusion, futures implications suggest greater collective research should be performed targeting the traits successful school leaders have demonstrated leading to student achievement.

References

Steppen J. Knezevich, Administration of Public Education, 4th Ed., Harper and Row Publishers, New York, 1984, P.- 8.

Paul R. Mort, “Principles of School Administration”, New York, McGraw Hill, 1946, P.-2.

Jesse B. Sears, “The Nature of the Administrative Process”, New York, McGraw Hill, 1950, P.-4

E.G. Guba and Bidwell, “Administrative Relationships”, University of Chicago: Chicago Midwest Administrative Center, 1957.

Jacob W. Getzels, James M. Lipham and Ronald F. Campbell, “Educational Administration As a Social Process”, New York, Evanston and Landon: Harper and Row Publishers, P.- 128.

Chester I. Barnard, “The Function of Executive”, Cambridge, Mass, Harward University Press, 1964, P.-60.

Carter V. Good, “Dictionary of Education”, 2nd ed., New York: McGraw Hill Book Company, 1959

Barker, B. (2007). The leadership paradox: Can school leaders transform student outcomes? School of Effectiveness and School Improvement, 18(1) 21-43.

Castangno, A. (2008). Improving academic achievement, but at what cost? The demands of diversity and equity at Birch Middle School. Journal of Cases in Educational Leadership, 11(1), 1-9.

ण् ‘आर्य’, डाॅ0 मोहन लाल, (2014), ’’शैक्षिक प्रषासन एवं प्रबन्धन’’, आर0लाल0 बुक डिपों, मेरठ।

ण् ‘आर्य’, डाॅ0 मोहन लाल, (2016), ’’शैक्षिक प्रषासन एवं प्रबन्ध’’, आर0लाल0 बुक डिपों, मेरठ।

ण् ‘आर्य’, डाॅ0 मोहन लाल, (2017), ’’अधिगम और षिक्षण’’, आर0लाल0 बुक डिपों, मेरठ।

ण् ‘आर्य’, डाॅ0 मोहन लाल, (2017), ’’ज्ञान और पाठ्यक्रम’’, आर0लाल0 बुक डिपों, मेरठ।

ण् ‘आर्य’, डाॅ0 मोहन लाल, (2017), ’’षिक्षा के ऐतिहासिक एवं राजनीतिक परिप्रेक्ष्य’’, आर0लाल0 बुक डिपों, मेरठ।

ण् ‘आर्य’, मोहन लाल, (2017), ’’अधिगम के लिए आंकलन’’, आर0लाल0 बुक डिपों, मेरठ।

ण् ‘आर्य’, डाॅ0 मोहन लाल, ’पाण्डेय’, डाॅ0 महेन्द्र प्रसाद, कौर, भूपेन्द्र एवं गोला, राजकुमारी (2017), ’’सामाजिक विज्ञान का षिक्षणषास्त्र’’, आर0लाल0 बुक डिपों, मेरठ।

Downloads

Published

2017-06-30