Employee Promotion System in Organizations: A Comparative Study of Public and Private Sector of North India

Authors

  • Dr. MAHENDER Pal

Keywords:

Promotion, Significant, Public, Private, Comparative, Organizations, Differences, Percent, Packages, Technique, Structured, Employees.

Abstract

The present study has been based on primary data collected from 100 employees of Public and Private organizations established in North India. A self structured questionnaire was utilized for the purpose of data collection. The data was analyzed using the statistical technique independent sample‘t’ test through SPSS version 18. Reliability of the data so collected was checked by using Cronbach’s Alpha Reliability Co-efficient. The findings were tested at 0.05 percent level of significance for obtaining significant difference between promotion system in public and private organizations of north India. In the finding of the study, it has been found that there is significant difference in promotion system in public and private organizations of north India.

References

 Ajila, C. & Abiola, A. (2004). Influence of Rewards on Workers Performance in an Organization. Journal

of

 Social Sciences, 8(1), 7-12.

 Bretz, R. D., Milkovich, G. T. & Read, W. (1992). The Current State of Performance Appraisal Research

and

 Practice: Concerns, Directions and Implications. Journal of Management, 18(2), 321- 352.

 C.I.P.D. Report. (2006). How Engaged are British Employees. Survey report, London. Retrieved at:

http://www.CIPD.co.uk/surveys on 25.03.2017.

 Islam, R., & Ismail, AZH. (2008). Employee motivation: a Malaysian perspective', International Journal of

 Commerce & Management, 18(4), 344-362.

 Joinson, Carla. (1996). Reward your best employees. HR Magazine, 4 (49-55).

 Khalid Said Al-Jarradi. (2011). An Investigation into the Effectiveness of the Reward System in the

Government

 Sector in the Sultanate of Oman and the Potential for Introducing a Total Reward Strategy. A thesis

 Submitted to The University of Manchester for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Human Resources

 Management in the Faculty of Humanities. Retrieved at https://www.escholar.manchester.ac.uk on

 25.03.2017

 Lawler, E.E. (1973). Motivation in work organizations. Belmont CA: Wadsworth Publishing. Wadsworth

Publishing

 Co Inc. Retrieved at https://www.amazon.co.uk on 25.03.2017

 Macourt, W & Wong A, R. (2003). Limits to strategic HRM: The case of the Mauritian Civil Service.

International

 Journal of Human Resource Management, 14(600-618).

 Njanja, W. L., Maina, R. N., Kibet, L. K. & Njagi, K. (2013). Effect of Reward on Employee Performance:

A Case

 of Kenya Power and Lighting Company Ltd., Nakuru, Kenya. International Journal of Business and

 Management, 8(21), 41-48.

 Oloko, O. (1972). Impact of Management Nationality on Workers Commitment to Industrial Employment

in

 Nigeria. Journal of Management Studies, 9(2), 206-226.

 Raven, B. H. (1992). A Power/Interaction Model of Interpersonal Influence: French & Raven thirty years

later.

 Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 7(2), 217–244.

Published

2022-05-30

Issue

Section

Articles