Deliberation on Religion and Science on Literary Platform: The Argumentation on Human Understanding About ‘Origin of Life’ in Dan Brown’s Origin (2017)

Authors

  • Dr. Sapanpreet Kaur Dr. Apruva Bakshi

Keywords:

Religion, Science, Literature, Evolutionary studies, Social science, Humanities

Abstract

Evolutionary research has been expanding rapidly into every region of social sciences like psychology, sociology, linguistics, etc. because the central concept in evolutionary social science and evolutionary studies is 'human nature.‟ Literature and Science is relatively a new interdisciplinary field that aims to put into dialogue the existing disciplines of literature, science and religion in the hope of providing new knowledge about either past or present. This paper attempts to assert the compatibility of religion and science, through the literary platform presented in Dan Brown‟s fictional work Origin (2017) with the aim in mind that literature does not only set itself as an intermediate platform where science and religion indulge in tete-a-tete negotiation but also promulgates itself as a wider discipline to explore and indulge in evolutionary theory. The study has analysed the „selectiveness of reading literary‟ of protagonist Kirsch to conclude that study of literature should be included in the wider field of evolutionary theory.

References

Allard, A. (1997) “L‟influence Des MathématiquesArabes Dans L‟occidentMédiéval.

in Rashed, R. Histoire Des Sciences Arabes”, Mathématiques et Physique, 3,199-229.

 Bodnar, Istvan. (2018). "Aristotle's Natural Philosophy". The Stanford Encyclopedia

of Philosophy. Edward N. Zalta (ed.)

 Brown, Dan. (2017).Origin. United States: Doubleday.

 Camazine, Scott. (2003). “Patterns in Nature”. Naturalhistorymag.com.

 Carroll, Joseph. (1995). Evolutionary and Literary Theory. Columbia: University of

Missouri Press.

 Darwin, Charles. (1903).More Letters of Charles Darwin: A Record of His Works in a

Series of Hitherto Unpublished Letters. Vol 1. New York: D Appleton.

 De Cruz, Helen. (2015). A Natural History of Natural Theology. The Cognitive

Science of Theology and Philosophy of Religion. Cambridge: MIT Press.

 Enciso, Adriana Diaz. William Blake‟s Method of Prophecy. Retrieved from

www.blakesociety.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/William-Blakes-Method-ofProphecy.pdf

 Fitzgerald, Edward. (1992). Rubaiyat of Omar Khayyam. London: The Curwen Press.

 Fraser, Giles. (2012).Nietzsche's Passionate Atheism Was the Making of

Me.www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2012/feb/05/passionate-atheism-meChristianity-Nietzsche

 Gardner, Martin. (1970). “The Fantastic Combination of John Conway‟s New Solitaire

Game „Life‟”. Scientific American. 223.4, 120-123.

 Harrison, Peter.(2006).“ „Science‟ and „Religion‟: Constructing the Boundaries.” The

Journal of

 Religion. 86, 81–106.

Published

2022-05-30

Issue

Section

Articles