RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PRINCIPAL’S ADMINISTRATIVE BEHAVIOUR AND SENIOR SECONDARY SCHOOL’S EFFECTIVENESS IN MORADABAD

Authors

  • Dr. Mohan Lal Arya’ Assistant Professor Department of Education School of Social Sciences and Computer Application IFTM University, Delhi Road, Moradabad

Keywords:

..

Abstract

This study was examined the relationship between principal’s administrative behaviour and senior secondary school’s effectiveness in Moradabad district. In the present study the investigator was used Survey method. The population of the study consisted of all the teachers and principals of the government and public senior secondary schools in Moradabad district. The sample was however made up of 600 teachers and 30 principals from 30 senior secondary schools across Moradabad District. Multistage, simple and stratified random sampling techniques were used to select the schools and the teachers for the study. The two sets of instruments were used to collect the data for the present study. The collected data were analyzed using frequency, percentage scores and Pearson product-moment correlation method. The hypothesis formulated was tested at 0.05 level of significance. The study revealed that the behaviour of principals in the study area was satisfactorily encouraging. The study also showed that the schools were effective in the affective and the psychomotor fields but not all that effective in the cognitive field. The study further showed significant relationship between principal’s Administrative behaviour and senior secondary schools effectiveness. On the bases of the findings, it was recommended that the principals of schools should not relevant in sustaining the temp of their Administrative behaviour. It was also recommended that all in the senior secondary school education as well as the government should try to uphold the level of performance of students in the affective and psychomotor field. 

References

Steppen J. Knezevich, Administration of Public Education, 4th Ed., Harper and Row Publishers, New York,

Jacob W. Getzels, James M. Lipham and Ronald F. Campbell, “Educational Administration As a Social Process”, New York, Evanston and Landon: Harper and Row Publishers.

Chester I. Barnard, “The Function of Executive”, Cambridge, Mass, Harward University Press, 1964.

Lec. C. Deightan, “Encyclopedia of Education.” Editor- in- chief, Vol.-3, The Machmillan Company & the free press, USAS, 1971.

Adeyemi, T. O. (2008). Predicting students’ performance in senior secondary certificate examination from performance in junior secondary certificate examinations in Ondo State, Nigeria. Humanity and Social Science Journal.

Charless Lauis Deros, “A study of competencies Required by Connecticut High School Principals as Perceived by the High school Principals and Those ithin the School system who Influence his Role”, D. A. I. 36:7, 1976.

Robert John Parry, “Elementary School Principals Effectiveness Perception of Principals and Superintendents”, D. A. I.- A, 38:11, 1978.

W. C. Jacobson, “Meeting the Challenge the rewards of Instructional Leadership for principals”, NASSP Bulletin 71 (498): 57-66, April 1987 Educational Administration Abstract, Vol-23, 1-4, 1988.

M. Das, “A study of the Administrative behaviour of secondary school principal in relation to selected school variables”, Fourth Survey of Educational Research, 1983.

Dominic J. Brewer, “Principals and student outcomes: Evidence- High schools”, Educational Administration Abstract, vol-29, n0-1-4, 1994.

R. Das, “ A study of principals’ Instructional Management behaviour students’ performance and Organizational climate in secondary schools”, Indian Educational Abstract Issue I, July 1996.

Aggarwal, J. C., “Educational Administration Management & Supervision, Arya Book Publication House, 5th Ed., 1994.

Dr. Mohan Lal ‘Arya’, (2014) ^^“kSf{kd iz”kklu ,oa izcU/ku^^] Surya Publication (R. Lall Book Depot), Meerut.

Downloads

Published

2015-04-30

Issue

Section

Articles