MARKETING MIX: THE COUNT OF PS CHANGING WITH MARKET DYNAMICS A PAPER ON TRENDS OBSERVED IN MARKETING DECISIONS WORLDWIDE

Authors

  • Dr Parag Pateria Professor Department Of Management Global Engineering Institute Jabalpur

Abstract

The chief objective of this paper is to revisit the current marketing mix applies mainly to the marketing. This study provides an suggestion to the marketers and can be used as tools to aid them in pursuing their marketing objectives. Borden (1965) claims to be the first to have used the term marketing mix and that it was suggested to him by Culliton’s (1948). McCarthy (1964) offered marketing mix, often referred to as the 4Ps, as a means of translating marketing planning into practice (Bennett, 1997). Marketing mix is originating from the single P (price) of microeconomic theory (Chong, 2003). New Ps was introduced into the marketing scene in order to face up into a highly competitively charged environment (Low and Tan, 1995). Even, Möller (2006) presents an up-to-date picture of the current standing in the debate around the Mix as marketing paradigm and predominant marketing management tool by reviewing academic views from five marketing management sub-disciplines (consumer marketing, relationship marketing, services marketing, retail marketing and industrial marketing) and an emerging marketing (E-Commerce). The concept of 4Ps has been criticised by number of studies, examples Lauterborn (1990), Möller (2006), Popovic (2006) and Fakeideas (2008). However, in spite of its deficiencies, the 4Ps remain a staple of the marketing mix. The subsequent Ps have yet to overcome a consensus about eligibility and agreement over the practical application (Kent and Brown, 2006).

References

Aldridge, A., Forcht, K. & Pierson, J. (1997). Get Linked or Get Lost: Marketing Strategy for the Internet. Internet Research: Electronic Networking Applications and Policy, 7(3), 161-169.

Allen, E. & Fjermestad, J. (2001). E-Commerce Marketing Strategies: An Integrated Framework and Case Analysis. Logistics Information Management, 14(1/2), 14-23.

Andersen, J. C. & Narus J. A. (1999). Business Market Management, Understanding, Creating and Delivering Value. New Jersey. Prentice Hall.

Baungartner J. (1991). Nonmarketing Professionals Need More Than 4Ps, Marketing News.

Beckwith, H. (2001). The Invisible Touch - The Four Keys of Modern Marketing. Texere Publishing.

Bennett, A. R. (1997). The Five Vs - A Buyer’s Perspective of the Marketing Mix. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 15(3), 151-156.

Bhatt G. & Emdad, A. F. (2001). An Analysis of the Virtual Chain in Electronic Commerce. Logistics Information Management, 14(1/2), 78-85.

Boekema, J. J., Bueren Van, E. B, Lobstein, S., Oosterhuis, A. & Schweitzer, P. (1995). Basisboek Marketing (Basic Book of Marketing), NL: Derde druk, Groningen, Wolters-Noordhoff. Booms B. H. & Bitner B. J. (1980).

Marketing strategies and organisation structures for service firms. In Donnelly, J. & George W. R. (Eds.), Marketing of services. American Marketing Association, 47-51.

Borden, N. H. (1965). The concept of the marketing mix. In Schwartz, G. (Ed), Science in marketing. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 386-397.

Brunner, G. C. (1989). The Marketing Mix: Time for Reconceptualization. Journal of Marketing Education, 11, 72-77.

Chaffey, D., Mayer, R., Johnston, K. & Ellis-Chadwick, F. (2000). Internet Marketing, Strategy, Implementation and Practice. FT/Prentice Hall, 40-48, 151-168.

Constantinides, E. (2002). The 4S Web-Marketing Mix Model. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 1(1), 57-76.

Cowell, D. W. (1984). The Marketing of Services, Institute of Marketing and the CAM foundation. Heineman Professional Publishing.

Culliton, J.W. (1948). The Management of Marketing Costs. Division of Research, Graduate School of Business Administration, Boston, MA: Harvard University.

Downloads

Published

2015-07-31

Issue

Section

Articles